recombinant fgf1 Search Results


91
Cell Signaling Technology Inc rrid ab 2739823
Rrid Ab 2739823, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/recombinant+fgf1/Human+FGF-acidic%2FFGF1+Recombinant+Protein/pm37524800-483-64-76
Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rrid ab 2739823 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
91/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
R&D Systems mcf7
Manuka honey activates AMPK signaling and inhibits mTOR and STAT3 downstream signaling. ( A ) <t>MCF7</t> cells were treated with increasing concentrations of Manuka honey (0–5%) and 5% Mesquite honey as control. After 24 h, cells were lysed and immunoblotted with specific antibodies. ( B ) MCF7 cells were treated with increasing concentrations of Manuka honey 0.3–5% ( w / v ). After 24 h, cells were lysed, and whole cell extracts were resolved by PAGE and immunoblotted with specific antibodies.
Mcf7, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/recombinant+fgf1/Recombinant+Human+FGF+acidic%2FFGF1+(aa+2-155)+Protein/pmc11279598-63-0-67
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mcf7 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
R&D Systems recombinant human fgf1 acidic
Transcriptomic CRC Subtypes and CAFs as Drivers of AR to Cetuximab (A) Transcriptomic subtypes in 13 BL and PD biopsy pairs. TA, transit amplifying; SL, stem-like. (B) Volcano plot showing differential expression of growth factors in 5 cases from (A) undergoing CMS2>4 switches. Significance was assessed by paired t test. (C) Changes in TGF-β and EMT transcriptomic signatures through CMS2>4 switches. (D) Changes in fibroblast abundance through CMS2>4 switches based on MCP-counter analysis. (E) Impact of CAF conditioned medium (CM) on the growth of DiFi (left panel) and LIM1215 (right panel) treated with 50 μg/mL CET for 5 days. (F) Western blot analysis showing CAF CM rescue of pERK in DiFi (left panel) and LIM1215 (right panel) treated with 200 μg/mL CET for 2 h. (G) mRNA expression (normalized counts) of growth factors (GFs) (left panel) and their receptors (right panel) in CAF, DiFi, and LIM1215 cells. (H) Growth assay with 200 μg/mL CET and <t>recombinant</t> GF at a concentration of 20 ng/mL <t>(FGF1/2),</t> 10 ng/mL (TGF-β) and 50 ng/mL (HGF) for 5 days in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (I) Western blot analysis of pERK with and without recombinant GF treatment in the presence or absence of 200 μg/mL CET in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (J) Growth assay with CAF CM and combinations of CET, pan-FGFR inhibitor (FGFRi), and MET inhibitor (METi) for 5 days in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (K) Western blot analysis of pERK after 2 h treatment with CAF CM and combinations of CET, FGFRi, and METi in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (E, H, and J) All error bars ± SD of six replicates. See also <xref ref-type=Figure S4 and . " width="250" height="auto" />
Recombinant Human Fgf1 Acidic, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/recombinant+fgf1/Recombinant+Human+FGF+acidic%2FFGF1+(aa+16-155)+Protein/pmc06617392-24-0-5
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
recombinant human fgf1 acidic - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Cell Signaling Technology Inc sirt 3
Transcriptomic CRC Subtypes and CAFs as Drivers of AR to Cetuximab (A) Transcriptomic subtypes in 13 BL and PD biopsy pairs. TA, transit amplifying; SL, stem-like. (B) Volcano plot showing differential expression of growth factors in 5 cases from (A) undergoing CMS2>4 switches. Significance was assessed by paired t test. (C) Changes in TGF-β and EMT transcriptomic signatures through CMS2>4 switches. (D) Changes in fibroblast abundance through CMS2>4 switches based on MCP-counter analysis. (E) Impact of CAF conditioned medium (CM) on the growth of DiFi (left panel) and LIM1215 (right panel) treated with 50 μg/mL CET for 5 days. (F) Western blot analysis showing CAF CM rescue of pERK in DiFi (left panel) and LIM1215 (right panel) treated with 200 μg/mL CET for 2 h. (G) mRNA expression (normalized counts) of growth factors (GFs) (left panel) and their receptors (right panel) in CAF, DiFi, and LIM1215 cells. (H) Growth assay with 200 μg/mL CET and <t>recombinant</t> GF at a concentration of 20 ng/mL <t>(FGF1/2),</t> 10 ng/mL (TGF-β) and 50 ng/mL (HGF) for 5 days in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (I) Western blot analysis of pERK with and without recombinant GF treatment in the presence or absence of 200 μg/mL CET in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (J) Growth assay with CAF CM and combinations of CET, pan-FGFR inhibitor (FGFRi), and MET inhibitor (METi) for 5 days in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (K) Western blot analysis of pERK after 2 h treatment with CAF CM and combinations of CET, FGFRi, and METi in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (E, H, and J) All error bars ± SD of six replicates. See also <xref ref-type=Figure S4 and . " width="250" height="auto" />
Sirt 3, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/recombinant+fgf1/Mouse%2FRat+FGF-acidic%2FFGF1+Recombinant+Protein/pmc10662127-170-13-28
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sirt 3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

91
OriGene cells
Transcriptomic CRC Subtypes and CAFs as Drivers of AR to Cetuximab (A) Transcriptomic subtypes in 13 BL and PD biopsy pairs. TA, transit amplifying; SL, stem-like. (B) Volcano plot showing differential expression of growth factors in 5 cases from (A) undergoing CMS2>4 switches. Significance was assessed by paired t test. (C) Changes in TGF-β and EMT transcriptomic signatures through CMS2>4 switches. (D) Changes in fibroblast abundance through CMS2>4 switches based on MCP-counter analysis. (E) Impact of CAF conditioned medium (CM) on the growth of DiFi (left panel) and LIM1215 (right panel) treated with 50 μg/mL CET for 5 days. (F) Western blot analysis showing CAF CM rescue of pERK in DiFi (left panel) and LIM1215 (right panel) treated with 200 μg/mL CET for 2 h. (G) mRNA expression (normalized counts) of growth factors (GFs) (left panel) and their receptors (right panel) in CAF, DiFi, and LIM1215 cells. (H) Growth assay with 200 μg/mL CET and <t>recombinant</t> GF at a concentration of 20 ng/mL <t>(FGF1/2),</t> 10 ng/mL (TGF-β) and 50 ng/mL (HGF) for 5 days in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (I) Western blot analysis of pERK with and without recombinant GF treatment in the presence or absence of 200 μg/mL CET in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (J) Growth assay with CAF CM and combinations of CET, pan-FGFR inhibitor (FGFRi), and MET inhibitor (METi) for 5 days in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (K) Western blot analysis of pERK after 2 h treatment with CAF CM and combinations of CET, FGFRi, and METi in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (E, H, and J) All error bars ± SD of six replicates. See also <xref ref-type=Figure S4 and . " width="250" height="auto" />
Cells, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/recombinant+fgf1/Fgf1+(NM_010197)+Mouse+Recombinant+Protein/pm37793502-112-3-14
Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
91/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
R&D Systems r d recombinant human fgf acidic aa
Transcriptomic CRC Subtypes and CAFs as Drivers of AR to Cetuximab (A) Transcriptomic subtypes in 13 BL and PD biopsy pairs. TA, transit amplifying; SL, stem-like. (B) Volcano plot showing differential expression of growth factors in 5 cases from (A) undergoing CMS2>4 switches. Significance was assessed by paired t test. (C) Changes in TGF-β and EMT transcriptomic signatures through CMS2>4 switches. (D) Changes in fibroblast abundance through CMS2>4 switches based on MCP-counter analysis. (E) Impact of CAF conditioned medium (CM) on the growth of DiFi (left panel) and LIM1215 (right panel) treated with 50 μg/mL CET for 5 days. (F) Western blot analysis showing CAF CM rescue of pERK in DiFi (left panel) and LIM1215 (right panel) treated with 200 μg/mL CET for 2 h. (G) mRNA expression (normalized counts) of growth factors (GFs) (left panel) and their receptors (right panel) in CAF, DiFi, and LIM1215 cells. (H) Growth assay with 200 μg/mL CET and <t>recombinant</t> GF at a concentration of 20 ng/mL <t>(FGF1/2),</t> 10 ng/mL (TGF-β) and 50 ng/mL (HGF) for 5 days in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (I) Western blot analysis of pERK with and without recombinant GF treatment in the presence or absence of 200 μg/mL CET in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (J) Growth assay with CAF CM and combinations of CET, pan-FGFR inhibitor (FGFRi), and MET inhibitor (METi) for 5 days in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (K) Western blot analysis of pERK after 2 h treatment with CAF CM and combinations of CET, FGFRi, and METi in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (E, H, and J) All error bars ± SD of six replicates. See also <xref ref-type=Figure S4 and . " width="250" height="auto" />
R D Recombinant Human Fgf Acidic Aa, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/recombinant+fgf1/Recombinant+Human+FGF+acidic%2FFGF1+(aa+2-155)+Protein%2C+CF/us09567385-83-58-70
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
r d recombinant human fgf acidic aa - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
R&D Systems recombinant mouse fgf 1
Transcriptomic CRC Subtypes and CAFs as Drivers of AR to Cetuximab (A) Transcriptomic subtypes in 13 BL and PD biopsy pairs. TA, transit amplifying; SL, stem-like. (B) Volcano plot showing differential expression of growth factors in 5 cases from (A) undergoing CMS2>4 switches. Significance was assessed by paired t test. (C) Changes in TGF-β and EMT transcriptomic signatures through CMS2>4 switches. (D) Changes in fibroblast abundance through CMS2>4 switches based on MCP-counter analysis. (E) Impact of CAF conditioned medium (CM) on the growth of DiFi (left panel) and LIM1215 (right panel) treated with 50 μg/mL CET for 5 days. (F) Western blot analysis showing CAF CM rescue of pERK in DiFi (left panel) and LIM1215 (right panel) treated with 200 μg/mL CET for 2 h. (G) mRNA expression (normalized counts) of growth factors (GFs) (left panel) and their receptors (right panel) in CAF, DiFi, and LIM1215 cells. (H) Growth assay with 200 μg/mL CET and <t>recombinant</t> GF at a concentration of 20 ng/mL <t>(FGF1/2),</t> 10 ng/mL (TGF-β) and 50 ng/mL (HGF) for 5 days in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (I) Western blot analysis of pERK with and without recombinant GF treatment in the presence or absence of 200 μg/mL CET in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (J) Growth assay with CAF CM and combinations of CET, pan-FGFR inhibitor (FGFRi), and MET inhibitor (METi) for 5 days in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (K) Western blot analysis of pERK after 2 h treatment with CAF CM and combinations of CET, FGFRi, and METi in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (E, H, and J) All error bars ± SD of six replicates. See also <xref ref-type=Figure S4 and . " width="250" height="auto" />
Recombinant Mouse Fgf 1, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/recombinant+fgf1/Recombinant+Mouse+FGF+acidic%2FFGF1+Protein/bio_rxiv__2025__11__24__690319-192-6-9
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
recombinant mouse fgf 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
R&D Systems human fgf acidic
Transcriptomic CRC Subtypes and CAFs as Drivers of AR to Cetuximab (A) Transcriptomic subtypes in 13 BL and PD biopsy pairs. TA, transit amplifying; SL, stem-like. (B) Volcano plot showing differential expression of growth factors in 5 cases from (A) undergoing CMS2>4 switches. Significance was assessed by paired t test. (C) Changes in TGF-β and EMT transcriptomic signatures through CMS2>4 switches. (D) Changes in fibroblast abundance through CMS2>4 switches based on MCP-counter analysis. (E) Impact of CAF conditioned medium (CM) on the growth of DiFi (left panel) and LIM1215 (right panel) treated with 50 μg/mL CET for 5 days. (F) Western blot analysis showing CAF CM rescue of pERK in DiFi (left panel) and LIM1215 (right panel) treated with 200 μg/mL CET for 2 h. (G) mRNA expression (normalized counts) of growth factors (GFs) (left panel) and their receptors (right panel) in CAF, DiFi, and LIM1215 cells. (H) Growth assay with 200 μg/mL CET and <t>recombinant</t> GF at a concentration of 20 ng/mL <t>(FGF1/2),</t> 10 ng/mL (TGF-β) and 50 ng/mL (HGF) for 5 days in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (I) Western blot analysis of pERK with and without recombinant GF treatment in the presence or absence of 200 μg/mL CET in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (J) Growth assay with CAF CM and combinations of CET, pan-FGFR inhibitor (FGFRi), and MET inhibitor (METi) for 5 days in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (K) Western blot analysis of pERK after 2 h treatment with CAF CM and combinations of CET, FGFRi, and METi in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (E, H, and J) All error bars ± SD of six replicates. See also <xref ref-type=Figure S4 and . " width="250" height="auto" />
Human Fgf Acidic, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/recombinant+fgf1/Recombinant+Human+FGF+acidic%2FFGF1+(aa+16-155)+Protein/pm41075247-764-22-28
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human fgf acidic - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
R&D Systems fgf1
Transcriptomic CRC Subtypes and CAFs as Drivers of AR to Cetuximab (A) Transcriptomic subtypes in 13 BL and PD biopsy pairs. TA, transit amplifying; SL, stem-like. (B) Volcano plot showing differential expression of growth factors in 5 cases from (A) undergoing CMS2>4 switches. Significance was assessed by paired t test. (C) Changes in TGF-β and EMT transcriptomic signatures through CMS2>4 switches. (D) Changes in fibroblast abundance through CMS2>4 switches based on MCP-counter analysis. (E) Impact of CAF conditioned medium (CM) on the growth of DiFi (left panel) and LIM1215 (right panel) treated with 50 μg/mL CET for 5 days. (F) Western blot analysis showing CAF CM rescue of pERK in DiFi (left panel) and LIM1215 (right panel) treated with 200 μg/mL CET for 2 h. (G) mRNA expression (normalized counts) of growth factors (GFs) (left panel) and their receptors (right panel) in CAF, DiFi, and LIM1215 cells. (H) Growth assay with 200 μg/mL CET and <t>recombinant</t> GF at a concentration of 20 ng/mL <t>(FGF1/2),</t> 10 ng/mL (TGF-β) and 50 ng/mL (HGF) for 5 days in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (I) Western blot analysis of pERK with and without recombinant GF treatment in the presence or absence of 200 μg/mL CET in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (J) Growth assay with CAF CM and combinations of CET, pan-FGFR inhibitor (FGFRi), and MET inhibitor (METi) for 5 days in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (K) Western blot analysis of pERK after 2 h treatment with CAF CM and combinations of CET, FGFRi, and METi in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (E, H, and J) All error bars ± SD of six replicates. See also <xref ref-type=Figure S4 and . " width="250" height="auto" />
Fgf1, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/recombinant+fgf1/Recombinant+Mouse+FGF+acidic%2FFGF1+Protein/pm37402714-213-22-23
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fgf1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
R&D Systems human recombinant fgf 1 afgf
Transcriptomic CRC Subtypes and CAFs as Drivers of AR to Cetuximab (A) Transcriptomic subtypes in 13 BL and PD biopsy pairs. TA, transit amplifying; SL, stem-like. (B) Volcano plot showing differential expression of growth factors in 5 cases from (A) undergoing CMS2>4 switches. Significance was assessed by paired t test. (C) Changes in TGF-β and EMT transcriptomic signatures through CMS2>4 switches. (D) Changes in fibroblast abundance through CMS2>4 switches based on MCP-counter analysis. (E) Impact of CAF conditioned medium (CM) on the growth of DiFi (left panel) and LIM1215 (right panel) treated with 50 μg/mL CET for 5 days. (F) Western blot analysis showing CAF CM rescue of pERK in DiFi (left panel) and LIM1215 (right panel) treated with 200 μg/mL CET for 2 h. (G) mRNA expression (normalized counts) of growth factors (GFs) (left panel) and their receptors (right panel) in CAF, DiFi, and LIM1215 cells. (H) Growth assay with 200 μg/mL CET and <t>recombinant</t> GF at a concentration of 20 ng/mL <t>(FGF1/2),</t> 10 ng/mL (TGF-β) and 50 ng/mL (HGF) for 5 days in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (I) Western blot analysis of pERK with and without recombinant GF treatment in the presence or absence of 200 μg/mL CET in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (J) Growth assay with CAF CM and combinations of CET, pan-FGFR inhibitor (FGFRi), and MET inhibitor (METi) for 5 days in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (K) Western blot analysis of pERK after 2 h treatment with CAF CM and combinations of CET, FGFRi, and METi in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (E, H, and J) All error bars ± SD of six replicates. See also <xref ref-type=Figure S4 and . " width="250" height="auto" />
Human Recombinant Fgf 1 Afgf, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/recombinant+fgf1/Recombinant+Human+FGF+acidic%2FFGF1%2C+Animal-Free+Protein/pm14871245-49-0-7
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human recombinant fgf 1 afgf - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Novus Biologicals human fgf1 acidic protein
Figure 1. CHIR99021 and/or <t>FGF1</t> NP treatment: assessment of cardiac function and infarct size in a mouse model of MI. Mice that were treated with intramyocardial injections of different NPs, including CHIR + FGF1-NPs, CHIR- NPs, FGF1-NPs, and empty NPs (nonloaded); MI-only control mice; and sham-operated control mice were subjected to echocardiographic assessments of left ventricular (LV) function (A). Ejection fraction (EF) (B), fractional shorten- ing (FS) (C), end-systolic diameter of the left ventricle (D), and end-diastolic diameter of the left ventricle (E) were assessed before MI induction (pre-S) and on post-MI day 28 (post-S). On day 28 after MI, CHIR + FGF1-NP treatment groups presented significantly greater EF and FS compared with other treatment as well as control groups (B and C) and significantly lower values of systolic/diastolic diameters of the left ventricle. Data are given as means ± SEM. There were 10–12 animals per group. Statistical analysis: 2-way ANOVA with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.01 vs. sham; †P < 0.01 vs. MI; ‡P < 0.05 vs. empty NPs; §P < 0.05 vs. CHIR-NPs, ||P < 0.01 vs. FGF1-NPs. Sirius Red/Fast Green histochemical staining revealing areas of infarcted (red, nonviable) and noninfarcted (green, viable) zones in post-MI day 28 ventricular tissue sections (F). The infarct size was quantified as the ratio of the scar area to the total surface area of the left ventricle and expressed as a percentage, for day 28 samples (G). At day 28, the CHIR + FGF1-NP treatment group showed significant reduction in infarct size compared with other NP treatment groups or the untreated control MI animals. Scale bar: 1 mm (panels in F). Data are given as means ± SEM. There were 10–12 animals per group. Statistical analysis: 1-way ANOVA with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.01 vs. MI; †P < 0.01 vs. empty NP; ‡P < 0.01 vs. CHIR-NP; §P < 0.01 vs. FGF1-NP.
Human Fgf1 Acidic Protein, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/recombinant+fgf1/Recombinant+Human+FGF+acidic%2FFGF1+(aa+16-155)+Protein%2C+CF/pm32453715-256-7-14
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human fgf1 acidic protein - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

91
R&D Systems recombinant acidic human fibroblast growth factor 1
Figure 1. CHIR99021 and/or <t>FGF1</t> NP treatment: assessment of cardiac function and infarct size in a mouse model of MI. Mice that were treated with intramyocardial injections of different NPs, including CHIR + FGF1-NPs, CHIR- NPs, FGF1-NPs, and empty NPs (nonloaded); MI-only control mice; and sham-operated control mice were subjected to echocardiographic assessments of left ventricular (LV) function (A). Ejection fraction (EF) (B), fractional shorten- ing (FS) (C), end-systolic diameter of the left ventricle (D), and end-diastolic diameter of the left ventricle (E) were assessed before MI induction (pre-S) and on post-MI day 28 (post-S). On day 28 after MI, CHIR + FGF1-NP treatment groups presented significantly greater EF and FS compared with other treatment as well as control groups (B and C) and significantly lower values of systolic/diastolic diameters of the left ventricle. Data are given as means ± SEM. There were 10–12 animals per group. Statistical analysis: 2-way ANOVA with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.01 vs. sham; †P < 0.01 vs. MI; ‡P < 0.05 vs. empty NPs; §P < 0.05 vs. CHIR-NPs, ||P < 0.01 vs. FGF1-NPs. Sirius Red/Fast Green histochemical staining revealing areas of infarcted (red, nonviable) and noninfarcted (green, viable) zones in post-MI day 28 ventricular tissue sections (F). The infarct size was quantified as the ratio of the scar area to the total surface area of the left ventricle and expressed as a percentage, for day 28 samples (G). At day 28, the CHIR + FGF1-NP treatment group showed significant reduction in infarct size compared with other NP treatment groups or the untreated control MI animals. Scale bar: 1 mm (panels in F). Data are given as means ± SEM. There were 10–12 animals per group. Statistical analysis: 1-way ANOVA with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.01 vs. MI; †P < 0.01 vs. empty NP; ‡P < 0.01 vs. CHIR-NP; §P < 0.01 vs. FGF1-NP.
Recombinant Acidic Human Fibroblast Growth Factor 1, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/recombinant+fgf1/Recombinant+Human+FGF+acidic%2FFGF1+Protein/10__1074_slash_jbc__m303488200-95-0-15
Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
recombinant acidic human fibroblast growth factor 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
91/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Manuka honey activates AMPK signaling and inhibits mTOR and STAT3 downstream signaling. ( A ) MCF7 cells were treated with increasing concentrations of Manuka honey (0–5%) and 5% Mesquite honey as control. After 24 h, cells were lysed and immunoblotted with specific antibodies. ( B ) MCF7 cells were treated with increasing concentrations of Manuka honey 0.3–5% ( w / v ). After 24 h, cells were lysed, and whole cell extracts were resolved by PAGE and immunoblotted with specific antibodies.

Journal: Nutrients

Article Title: Manuka Honey Inhibits Human Breast Cancer Progression in Preclinical Models

doi: 10.3390/nu16142369

Figure Lengend Snippet: Manuka honey activates AMPK signaling and inhibits mTOR and STAT3 downstream signaling. ( A ) MCF7 cells were treated with increasing concentrations of Manuka honey (0–5%) and 5% Mesquite honey as control. After 24 h, cells were lysed and immunoblotted with specific antibodies. ( B ) MCF7 cells were treated with increasing concentrations of Manuka honey 0.3–5% ( w / v ). After 24 h, cells were lysed, and whole cell extracts were resolved by PAGE and immunoblotted with specific antibodies.

Article Snippet: MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 BC cells were cultured in 6-well plates at a concentration of 250,000 cells/well for 24 h. The next day, cells were treated with either 2.5% MH, 5.0% MH, 5.0% dextrose, 5.0% Mesquite honey, or 10 μM Camptothecin for 24 and 48 h. Cells were collected with AccutaseTM cell dissociation reagent, washed and stained using an Annexin V-FITC and 7-AAD Dead Cell Apoptosis Detection Kit (R&D Systems), and analyzed using flow cytometry.

Techniques: Control

Transcriptomic CRC Subtypes and CAFs as Drivers of AR to Cetuximab (A) Transcriptomic subtypes in 13 BL and PD biopsy pairs. TA, transit amplifying; SL, stem-like. (B) Volcano plot showing differential expression of growth factors in 5 cases from (A) undergoing CMS2>4 switches. Significance was assessed by paired t test. (C) Changes in TGF-β and EMT transcriptomic signatures through CMS2>4 switches. (D) Changes in fibroblast abundance through CMS2>4 switches based on MCP-counter analysis. (E) Impact of CAF conditioned medium (CM) on the growth of DiFi (left panel) and LIM1215 (right panel) treated with 50 μg/mL CET for 5 days. (F) Western blot analysis showing CAF CM rescue of pERK in DiFi (left panel) and LIM1215 (right panel) treated with 200 μg/mL CET for 2 h. (G) mRNA expression (normalized counts) of growth factors (GFs) (left panel) and their receptors (right panel) in CAF, DiFi, and LIM1215 cells. (H) Growth assay with 200 μg/mL CET and recombinant GF at a concentration of 20 ng/mL (FGF1/2), 10 ng/mL (TGF-β) and 50 ng/mL (HGF) for 5 days in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (I) Western blot analysis of pERK with and without recombinant GF treatment in the presence or absence of 200 μg/mL CET in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (J) Growth assay with CAF CM and combinations of CET, pan-FGFR inhibitor (FGFRi), and MET inhibitor (METi) for 5 days in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (K) Western blot analysis of pERK after 2 h treatment with CAF CM and combinations of CET, FGFRi, and METi in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (E, H, and J) All error bars ± SD of six replicates. See also <xref ref-type=Figure S4 and . " width="100%" height="100%">

Journal: Cancer Cell

Article Title: Genomic and Transcriptomic Determinants of Therapy Resistance and Immune Landscape Evolution during Anti-EGFR Treatment in Colorectal Cancer

doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.05.013

Figure Lengend Snippet: Transcriptomic CRC Subtypes and CAFs as Drivers of AR to Cetuximab (A) Transcriptomic subtypes in 13 BL and PD biopsy pairs. TA, transit amplifying; SL, stem-like. (B) Volcano plot showing differential expression of growth factors in 5 cases from (A) undergoing CMS2>4 switches. Significance was assessed by paired t test. (C) Changes in TGF-β and EMT transcriptomic signatures through CMS2>4 switches. (D) Changes in fibroblast abundance through CMS2>4 switches based on MCP-counter analysis. (E) Impact of CAF conditioned medium (CM) on the growth of DiFi (left panel) and LIM1215 (right panel) treated with 50 μg/mL CET for 5 days. (F) Western blot analysis showing CAF CM rescue of pERK in DiFi (left panel) and LIM1215 (right panel) treated with 200 μg/mL CET for 2 h. (G) mRNA expression (normalized counts) of growth factors (GFs) (left panel) and their receptors (right panel) in CAF, DiFi, and LIM1215 cells. (H) Growth assay with 200 μg/mL CET and recombinant GF at a concentration of 20 ng/mL (FGF1/2), 10 ng/mL (TGF-β) and 50 ng/mL (HGF) for 5 days in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (I) Western blot analysis of pERK with and without recombinant GF treatment in the presence or absence of 200 μg/mL CET in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (J) Growth assay with CAF CM and combinations of CET, pan-FGFR inhibitor (FGFRi), and MET inhibitor (METi) for 5 days in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (K) Western blot analysis of pERK after 2 h treatment with CAF CM and combinations of CET, FGFRi, and METi in DiFi (top panel) and LIM1215 (bottom panel). (E, H, and J) All error bars ± SD of six replicates. See also Figure S4 and .

Article Snippet: Recombinant human FGF1 acidic , RnD Systems , Cat# 232-FA-025.

Techniques: Quantitative Proteomics, Western Blot, Expressing, Growth Assay, Recombinant, Concentration Assay

Journal: Cancer Cell

Article Title: Genomic and Transcriptomic Determinants of Therapy Resistance and Immune Landscape Evolution during Anti-EGFR Treatment in Colorectal Cancer

doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.05.013

Figure Lengend Snippet:

Article Snippet: Recombinant human FGF1 acidic , RnD Systems , Cat# 232-FA-025.

Techniques: Control, Recombinant, Sequencing, Software

Figure 1. CHIR99021 and/or FGF1 NP treatment: assessment of cardiac function and infarct size in a mouse model of MI. Mice that were treated with intramyocardial injections of different NPs, including CHIR + FGF1-NPs, CHIR- NPs, FGF1-NPs, and empty NPs (nonloaded); MI-only control mice; and sham-operated control mice were subjected to echocardiographic assessments of left ventricular (LV) function (A). Ejection fraction (EF) (B), fractional shorten- ing (FS) (C), end-systolic diameter of the left ventricle (D), and end-diastolic diameter of the left ventricle (E) were assessed before MI induction (pre-S) and on post-MI day 28 (post-S). On day 28 after MI, CHIR + FGF1-NP treatment groups presented significantly greater EF and FS compared with other treatment as well as control groups (B and C) and significantly lower values of systolic/diastolic diameters of the left ventricle. Data are given as means ± SEM. There were 10–12 animals per group. Statistical analysis: 2-way ANOVA with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.01 vs. sham; †P < 0.01 vs. MI; ‡P < 0.05 vs. empty NPs; §P < 0.05 vs. CHIR-NPs, ||P < 0.01 vs. FGF1-NPs. Sirius Red/Fast Green histochemical staining revealing areas of infarcted (red, nonviable) and noninfarcted (green, viable) zones in post-MI day 28 ventricular tissue sections (F). The infarct size was quantified as the ratio of the scar area to the total surface area of the left ventricle and expressed as a percentage, for day 28 samples (G). At day 28, the CHIR + FGF1-NP treatment group showed significant reduction in infarct size compared with other NP treatment groups or the untreated control MI animals. Scale bar: 1 mm (panels in F). Data are given as means ± SEM. There were 10–12 animals per group. Statistical analysis: 1-way ANOVA with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.01 vs. MI; †P < 0.01 vs. empty NP; ‡P < 0.01 vs. CHIR-NP; §P < 0.01 vs. FGF1-NP.

Journal: JCI insight

Article Title: Myocardial protection by nanomaterials formulated with CHIR99021 and FGF1.

doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.132796

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 1. CHIR99021 and/or FGF1 NP treatment: assessment of cardiac function and infarct size in a mouse model of MI. Mice that were treated with intramyocardial injections of different NPs, including CHIR + FGF1-NPs, CHIR- NPs, FGF1-NPs, and empty NPs (nonloaded); MI-only control mice; and sham-operated control mice were subjected to echocardiographic assessments of left ventricular (LV) function (A). Ejection fraction (EF) (B), fractional shorten- ing (FS) (C), end-systolic diameter of the left ventricle (D), and end-diastolic diameter of the left ventricle (E) were assessed before MI induction (pre-S) and on post-MI day 28 (post-S). On day 28 after MI, CHIR + FGF1-NP treatment groups presented significantly greater EF and FS compared with other treatment as well as control groups (B and C) and significantly lower values of systolic/diastolic diameters of the left ventricle. Data are given as means ± SEM. There were 10–12 animals per group. Statistical analysis: 2-way ANOVA with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.01 vs. sham; †P < 0.01 vs. MI; ‡P < 0.05 vs. empty NPs; §P < 0.05 vs. CHIR-NPs, ||P < 0.01 vs. FGF1-NPs. Sirius Red/Fast Green histochemical staining revealing areas of infarcted (red, nonviable) and noninfarcted (green, viable) zones in post-MI day 28 ventricular tissue sections (F). The infarct size was quantified as the ratio of the scar area to the total surface area of the left ventricle and expressed as a percentage, for day 28 samples (G). At day 28, the CHIR + FGF1-NP treatment group showed significant reduction in infarct size compared with other NP treatment groups or the untreated control MI animals. Scale bar: 1 mm (panels in F). Data are given as means ± SEM. There were 10–12 animals per group. Statistical analysis: 1-way ANOVA with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.01 vs. MI; †P < 0.01 vs. empty NP; ‡P < 0.01 vs. CHIR-NP; §P < 0.01 vs. FGF1-NP.

Article Snippet: A double-emulsion (water/oil/water phase) technique for recombinant human FGF1 acidic protein (rhFGF1, aa 16-155 (Novus Biologicals, Inc.) and a single-emulsion (oil/water phase) technique for CHIR99021 were used.

Techniques: Control, Staining

Figure 2. Direct intramyocardial injection of free CHIR99021 and/or FGF1: assessment of cardiac function and infarct size in a mouse model of MI. Mice were treated with direct intramyocardial injections of free CHIR, FGF1, and CHIR + FGF1 while MI-only mice served as controls. (A) Echocardiographic assessment of LV function. EF (B) and FS (C) were determined before MI (pre-S) and after 28 days (post-S). On day 28 after MI, no difference was identified among different treatment groups (means ± SEM, 5 animals per group). (D) Fibrosis, as assessed by Sirius Red/Fast Green histochemical stain- ing (scale bar: 1 mm). At day 28, fibrosis, expressed as the ratio of the scar area to the total surface area of the left ventricle, did not differ between groups (E). There were 5 animals per group. Statistical analysis: 2-way ANOVA (B and C) and 1-way ANOVA (E) with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.01 vs. sham (B and C, post-S).

Journal: JCI insight

Article Title: Myocardial protection by nanomaterials formulated with CHIR99021 and FGF1.

doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.132796

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 2. Direct intramyocardial injection of free CHIR99021 and/or FGF1: assessment of cardiac function and infarct size in a mouse model of MI. Mice were treated with direct intramyocardial injections of free CHIR, FGF1, and CHIR + FGF1 while MI-only mice served as controls. (A) Echocardiographic assessment of LV function. EF (B) and FS (C) were determined before MI (pre-S) and after 28 days (post-S). On day 28 after MI, no difference was identified among different treatment groups (means ± SEM, 5 animals per group). (D) Fibrosis, as assessed by Sirius Red/Fast Green histochemical stain- ing (scale bar: 1 mm). At day 28, fibrosis, expressed as the ratio of the scar area to the total surface area of the left ventricle, did not differ between groups (E). There were 5 animals per group. Statistical analysis: 2-way ANOVA (B and C) and 1-way ANOVA (E) with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.01 vs. sham (B and C, post-S).

Article Snippet: A double-emulsion (water/oil/water phase) technique for recombinant human FGF1 acidic protein (rhFGF1, aa 16-155 (Novus Biologicals, Inc.) and a single-emulsion (oil/water phase) technique for CHIR99021 were used.

Techniques: Injection, Staining

Figure 3. Detection and quantification of apoptosis by TUNEL assay in the mouse model of MI. (A) Seventy-two hours posttreatment, the CHIR + FGF1- NP treatment group showed significantly fewer numbers of TUNEL+ cells in the border zone compared with the other treatment groups (scale bar: 50 μm) (B). Cells were also counterstained for nuclei (blue, DAPI). Data are given as means ± SEM. There were 5 animals per group. Statistical analysis: 1-way ANOVA with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.01 vs. sham; †P < 0.01 vs. MI; ‡P < 0.01 vs. empty NP; §P < 0.01 vs. CHIR-NPs; ||P < 0.01 vs. FGF1-NPs.

Journal: JCI insight

Article Title: Myocardial protection by nanomaterials formulated with CHIR99021 and FGF1.

doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.132796

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 3. Detection and quantification of apoptosis by TUNEL assay in the mouse model of MI. (A) Seventy-two hours posttreatment, the CHIR + FGF1- NP treatment group showed significantly fewer numbers of TUNEL+ cells in the border zone compared with the other treatment groups (scale bar: 50 μm) (B). Cells were also counterstained for nuclei (blue, DAPI). Data are given as means ± SEM. There were 5 animals per group. Statistical analysis: 1-way ANOVA with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.01 vs. sham; †P < 0.01 vs. MI; ‡P < 0.01 vs. empty NP; §P < 0.01 vs. CHIR-NPs; ||P < 0.01 vs. FGF1-NPs.

Article Snippet: A double-emulsion (water/oil/water phase) technique for recombinant human FGF1 acidic protein (rhFGF1, aa 16-155 (Novus Biologicals, Inc.) and a single-emulsion (oil/water phase) technique for CHIR99021 were used.

Techniques: TUNEL Assay

Figure 4. Evaluation of NPs mediated neo-angiogenesis in the mouse model of MI. (A) Expression of the endothelium-specific lectin, isolectin B4 (red, IB4) and smooth muscle protein, SM22-α (green, SM22α), in the periinfarct border zone sections 28 days after MI (scale bar: 50 μm). (B and C) Graphical expression of angiogenesis data. The CHIR + FGF1-NP–treated group showed significantly elevated vascular densities compared with other NP treatment groups and the untreated MI group, but no significant difference in vascular densities was observed between the CHIR + FGF1-NP treat- ment group and the sham-operated controls. Data are given as means ± SEM. There were 10–12 animals per group. Statistical analysis: 1-way ANOVA with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.01 vs. sham; †P < 0.01 vs. MI; ‡P < 0.01 vs. empty NPs; §P < 0.01 vs. CHIR-NPs; ||P < 0.01 vs. FGF1-NPs. (D–G) Cell cycle activity of endothelial cells assessed by a dual staining for Ki-67 (green) and IB4 (red; D and F) and phospho–histone H3 (PH3) (green) and IB4 (red; E and G). Scale bar: 20 μm. Data are given as means ± SEM. There were 10–12 animals per group. Statistical analysis: 1-way ANOVA with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.01 vs. sham; †P < 0.01 vs. MI; ‡P < 0.01 vs. empty NPs; §P < 0.01 vs. CHIR-NPs; ||P < 0.01 vs. FGF1-NPs.

Journal: JCI insight

Article Title: Myocardial protection by nanomaterials formulated with CHIR99021 and FGF1.

doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.132796

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 4. Evaluation of NPs mediated neo-angiogenesis in the mouse model of MI. (A) Expression of the endothelium-specific lectin, isolectin B4 (red, IB4) and smooth muscle protein, SM22-α (green, SM22α), in the periinfarct border zone sections 28 days after MI (scale bar: 50 μm). (B and C) Graphical expression of angiogenesis data. The CHIR + FGF1-NP–treated group showed significantly elevated vascular densities compared with other NP treatment groups and the untreated MI group, but no significant difference in vascular densities was observed between the CHIR + FGF1-NP treat- ment group and the sham-operated controls. Data are given as means ± SEM. There were 10–12 animals per group. Statistical analysis: 1-way ANOVA with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.01 vs. sham; †P < 0.01 vs. MI; ‡P < 0.01 vs. empty NPs; §P < 0.01 vs. CHIR-NPs; ||P < 0.01 vs. FGF1-NPs. (D–G) Cell cycle activity of endothelial cells assessed by a dual staining for Ki-67 (green) and IB4 (red; D and F) and phospho–histone H3 (PH3) (green) and IB4 (red; E and G). Scale bar: 20 μm. Data are given as means ± SEM. There were 10–12 animals per group. Statistical analysis: 1-way ANOVA with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.01 vs. sham; †P < 0.01 vs. MI; ‡P < 0.01 vs. empty NPs; §P < 0.01 vs. CHIR-NPs; ||P < 0.01 vs. FGF1-NPs.

Article Snippet: A double-emulsion (water/oil/water phase) technique for recombinant human FGF1 acidic protein (rhFGF1, aa 16-155 (Novus Biologicals, Inc.) and a single-emulsion (oil/water phase) technique for CHIR99021 were used.

Techniques: Expressing, Activity Assay, Staining

Figure 5. Assessment of LV morphology and function in a pig model of IR injury. Cardiac MRI recordings in the experimental groups at end-diastole (ED) and end-systole (ES). At day 28, the CHIR + FGF1-NP-treated group revealed significant reduction in infarct size compared with the untreated IR group (B). On the contrary, EF (C), CO (D), and SV (E) were significantly greater in CHIR + FGF1-NP–treated groups than in untreated IR groups while LV end-diastolic volume and LV end-systolic volume were significantly lower (F and G). Data are given as means ± SEM. There were 4 animals per group. Statistical analysis: 2-way ANOVA with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.01 vs. pre-IR; †P < 0.05 vs. week 1; ‡P < 0.05 vs. IR. Macroscopic areas of infarction/fibrosis/scar (H) at after-IR day 28 in serial transverse sections of fresh (scale bar: 1 cm) representative micrographs of Sirius Red/Fast Green histochemical staining, revealing areas of infarcted (red, nonviable) and noninfarcted (green, viable) zones (I) (scale bar: 1 mm) and quantification of left anterior wall thickness (J). Data are given as means ± SEM. There were 4 animals per group. Statistical analysis: 1-way ANOVA with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.01 vs. control; †P < 0.05 vs. IR.

Journal: JCI insight

Article Title: Myocardial protection by nanomaterials formulated with CHIR99021 and FGF1.

doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.132796

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 5. Assessment of LV morphology and function in a pig model of IR injury. Cardiac MRI recordings in the experimental groups at end-diastole (ED) and end-systole (ES). At day 28, the CHIR + FGF1-NP-treated group revealed significant reduction in infarct size compared with the untreated IR group (B). On the contrary, EF (C), CO (D), and SV (E) were significantly greater in CHIR + FGF1-NP–treated groups than in untreated IR groups while LV end-diastolic volume and LV end-systolic volume were significantly lower (F and G). Data are given as means ± SEM. There were 4 animals per group. Statistical analysis: 2-way ANOVA with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.01 vs. pre-IR; †P < 0.05 vs. week 1; ‡P < 0.05 vs. IR. Macroscopic areas of infarction/fibrosis/scar (H) at after-IR day 28 in serial transverse sections of fresh (scale bar: 1 cm) representative micrographs of Sirius Red/Fast Green histochemical staining, revealing areas of infarcted (red, nonviable) and noninfarcted (green, viable) zones (I) (scale bar: 1 mm) and quantification of left anterior wall thickness (J). Data are given as means ± SEM. There were 4 animals per group. Statistical analysis: 1-way ANOVA with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.01 vs. control; †P < 0.05 vs. IR.

Article Snippet: A double-emulsion (water/oil/water phase) technique for recombinant human FGF1 acidic protein (rhFGF1, aa 16-155 (Novus Biologicals, Inc.) and a single-emulsion (oil/water phase) technique for CHIR99021 were used.

Techniques: Staining, Control